Talk:Planet Classification: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Planet Classification
(Created page with "{{Talk Notice}} This page took a lot of work to put together. There is no singular definitive source for planetary class information and some of the information canonical to...")
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


Predominantly, I wanted to give credit where credit is due, this page was difficult to construct and would not be possible without the work of others.
Predominantly, I wanted to give credit where credit is due, this page was difficult to construct and would not be possible without the work of others.
[[User:Cyclops|Cyclops]] ([[User talk:Cyclops|talk]]) 19:57, 25 December 2021 (PST)
[[User:Cyclops|Cyclops]] ([[User talk:Cyclops|talk]]) 19:57, 25 December 2021 (PST)

Revision as of 03:57, 26 December 2021

This page took a lot of work to put together. There is no singular definitive source for planetary class information and some of the information canonical to Star Trek was contradictory, particularly within Star Trek the Original Series (TOS). As such this data has been pulled from multiple sources. The more reliable source has been the Star Trek Theurgy site. Much of this data matches with data found on another site Star Trek the Final Frontier, which seems to have fallen into some amount of disrepair with missing images and some of the data missing as well. Originally I was pulling planetary class data from this latter web site, but that site may no longer be maintained. Finally, I also pulled data from a third web site on Blogger, Immaterial. All three sides provided excellent data to complete this list in conjunction with Memory Alpha and Memory Beta. In some cases where this information did not jive well with other information, I edited descriptions and added my own take on things.

Predominantly, I wanted to give credit where credit is due, this page was difficult to construct and would not be possible without the work of others.

Cyclops (talk) 19:57, 25 December 2021 (PST)